Aligning Fund Lock-up with Your Citizenship Timeline
With Law 61/2025 proposing a 10-year citizenship requirement (currently under review), understanding how your fund timeline aligns with your goals—and avoiding Liquidity Mismatch—is critical.
Current Status: Under existing law, citizenship eligibility begins after 5 years of legal residency. Law 61/2025 proposes extending this to 10 years for non-CPLP nationals—but this is currently under constitutional review and not yet in effect.
The Application-Date Counting Rule: Under the current favorable interpretation, your residency period counts from application submission, not card issuance. An applicant in 2025 can reasonably expect citizenship eligibility by 2030 under current rules. See our Regulatory Status page for the latest updates.
Liquidity Mismatch Risk: If your fund term expires before your citizenship timeline, you face reinvestment risk—needing to find another qualifying fund to maintain residency. A 6-year fund with a potential 10-year path creates a gap.
This guide helps you align your fund selection with both current and potential future scenarios, avoiding the costly mistake of mismatched timelines.
Understanding the Different Timelines#
Golden Visa Minimum Hold: 5 Years
You must maintain your €500,000 investment for at least 5 years to keep your Golden Visa residency status. Selling before this voids your residency rights.
Citizenship Eligibility: Two Scenarios
| Scenario | Requirement | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Current Law | 5 years of legal residency | Active |
| Law 61/2025 | 10 years for non-CPLP | Under constitutional review |
Application-Date Counting Rule (Critical)
Under the current favorable interpretation, your clock starts from application submission, not card issuance. An applicant in Q1 2025 can target citizenship eligibility by 2030 under current rules—regardless of AIMA processing delays.
Fund Duration: Varies
- Open-ended mutual funds: No fixed term, but check redemption terms
- Closed-end PE funds: Typically 6-10 years
- VC funds: Often 10+ years
The Alignment Challenge (Liquidity Mismatch):
Your fund's timeline should match your citizenship goal—under both current and proposed scenarios. If pursuing citizenship:
- A 6-year fund + 10-year path = Liquidity Mismatch (reinvestment required)
- A 10-year fund + 10-year path = Aligned
- An open-ended fund = Maximum flexibility
Liquidity Mismatch Alert: The Critical Risk#
What is Liquidity Mismatch?
Liquidity Mismatch occurs when your fund's term is shorter than your citizenship timeline. If your fund matures before you're eligible for citizenship, you must:
- Find and invest in another qualifying fund (€500k+ again)
- Navigate a potentially different regulatory environment
- Accept reinvestment risk (fund availability, terms, fees)
Risk Assessment Matrix
| Fund Term | 5-Year Path (Current) | 10-Year Path (Proposed) |
|---|---|---|
| 5-6 years | Aligned | HIGH RISK - MISMATCH |
| 7-8 years | Buffer | MODERATE RISK |
| 10 years | Excess term | Aligned |
| Open-ended | Flexible | Flexible |
Why This Matters Now
With Law 61/2025 under review, you're essentially planning for uncertainty:
- If 5-year path continues: Any fund 5+ years works
- If 10-year path enacted: 6-7 year funds create gaps
- Prudent approach: Choose funds that work under either scenario
Mitigation Strategies
- Choose 10-year closed-end funds: Aligned with proposed law; if current law remains, you simply hold longer
- Use open-ended funds: Maximum flexibility; exit when ready
- Verify reinvestment provisions: Some funds allow rolling into successor funds
- Understand extension clauses: Many PE funds can extend 2-3 years if needed
Important
Timeline Scenarios: Planning Your Path#
Scenario 1: Residency Only (5-7 Years)
If you only want Golden Visa residency (not citizenship), you can exit after 5 years.
- Fund choice: Open-ended funds or 6-7 year PE funds work well
- Key consideration: Ensure fund allows exit after minimum period
- Watch for: Funds with penalties for early redemption
Scenario 2: Citizenship Path - Current Law (5-6 Years to Eligibility)
Under current rules, citizenship eligibility at 5 years; application takes 12-24 months.
- Fund choice: 7-year funds provide buffer
- Timeline: Apply for citizenship in year 5, receive in year 6-7
- Key consideration: Application-Date Counting Rule means clock starts at submission
Scenario 3: Citizenship Path - Proposed Law (10+ Years)
If Law 61/2025 is enacted with 10-year requirement:
- Fund choice: 10-year PE/VC funds or open-ended
- Timeline: Apply for citizenship in year 10, receive in year 11-12
- Key consideration: Avoid Liquidity Mismatch with shorter funds
Scenario 4: Hedging Both Outcomes
If uncertain about final law:
- Recommended: Open-ended funds or 10-year closed-end
- Rationale: Works under either scenario
- Trade-off: May hold longer than necessary if 5-year path continues
Scenario 5: Family Considerations
If including family members:
- Remember: Each family member's status depends on main applicant's investment
- Plan for: Longest timeline needed by any family member
- Consider: Children aging out if timeline extends
Not Sure Which Fund Fits Your Profile?
Share your timeline, risk tolerance, and tax situation — we'll match you with the right funds in under 2 minutes.
Fund Duration Structures Explained#
Open-Ended Funds
- No fixed maturity date
- Can typically redeem after initial lock-up (often 5 years)
- NAV-based redemption
- Advantage: Flexibility to exit when ready
- Disadvantage: Redemption may face queues or restrictions
7-Year Closed-End Funds
- Fixed 7-year fund life
- Capital returned at fund termination
- Common for PE funds
- Advantage: Matches original citizenship timeline
- Disadvantage: Now misaligned with 10-year citizenship rule
10-Year Closed-End Funds
- Fixed 10-year fund life
- Aligns with new citizenship timeline
- Common for PE and VC
- Advantage: Natural alignment with citizenship goal
- Disadvantage: Very long commitment if plans change
VC Funds (10-15 Years)
- Often longest holding periods
- Exit depends on portfolio company outcomes
- May have extensions beyond stated term
- Advantage: Potential for highest returns
- Disadvantage: Uncertainty on actual exit timing
Exit Strategy Considerations#
Before Investing, Understand:
-
How does redemption work?
- Is there a notice period?
- Are there redemption fees?
- What's the valuation methodology?
-
What happens at fund maturity?
- Cash distribution?
- In-kind distribution?
- Option to roll into successor fund?
-
What if the fund extends?
- Many PE/VC funds have extension provisions
- You may not have a choice in extensions
- Understand the extension terms upfront
-
What if you need to exit early?
- Secondary market for fund interests?
- Transfer provisions in fund documents?
- Penalty structures?
-
What if the fund manager changes?
- Key person clauses?
- Impact on investment strategy?
- Your rights if management changes?
Practical Recommendations#
If Pursuing Citizenship (10-Year Path):
- Prefer 10-year funds that align naturally
- Or choose open-ended funds with reinvestment options
- Ensure fund manager has long-term stability
- Factor in extension risk for closed-end funds
If Uncertain About Citizenship:
- Choose open-ended funds for flexibility
- Or 7-year funds with clear exit/reinvestment terms
- Avoid 15-year VC funds that lock you in
- Value optionality over potential returns
If Only Want Residency (5-7 Years):
- Open-ended funds work well
- 7-year PE funds align perfectly
- Check redemption terms carefully
- Ensure no penalties for post-minimum exit
For All Scenarios:
- Read fund documents carefully before investing
- Understand exact exit mechanisms
- Don't assume flexibility—verify it
- Consider what happens if your plans change
Frequently Asked Questions
Liquidity Mismatch occurs when your fund matures before your citizenship timeline. For example, a 6-year fund with a 10-year citizenship path means you must reinvest at year 6. This creates risk: you need to find another qualifying fund, navigate potentially different regulations, and commit another €500k.
You would need to reinvest in another qualifying fund to maintain residency until citizenship eligibility. This is called Liquidity Mismatch Risk. Planning fund duration around your goals—considering both current and proposed law—avoids this problem.
No, Law 61/2025 is under constitutional review and not yet implemented. Current applicants can proceed under the existing 5-year framework. However, prudent planning means choosing funds that work under either scenario. See our Regulatory Status page for updates.
Under the current Application-Date Counting Rule, your residency period counts from application submission—not card issuance. This protects you from AIMA processing delays (currently 18-24 months). An applicant in 2025 can target citizenship eligibility by 2030.
Some funds allow secondary market transfers, but this is not guaranteed. The new investor would not inherit your Golden Visa status—they would need to apply separately. Check fund documents for transfer provisions.
Get Timeline-Aligned Recommendations
Tell us your residency and citizenship goals, and we'll recommend funds with appropriate holding periods.